On the acquisition of negation: What role does Universal Grammar play in first and second language acquisition?

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book On the acquisition of negation: What role does Universal Grammar play in first and second language acquisition? by Lars Berghaus, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Lars Berghaus ISBN: 9783638686341
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: May 20, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Lars Berghaus
ISBN: 9783638686341
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: May 20, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject American Studies - Linguistics, grade: 2,3, University of Cologne, 14 Literaturquellen entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The ability to learn and produce natural language and move beyond the communication of sign and body language is unique to human beings. The acquisition of language is possible since grammar is assumed to be universal. Universal Grammar (UG) defines properties of language itself. CHOMSKY'S theory of grammar is constrained, first, by universal grammatical principles which determine the broad outline of grammar and are generally true and, second, by grammatical parameters which are language-specific dimensions of a particular language and allow crosslinguistic variation. The first doesn't have to be learned since it is part of the innate language faculty; the latter needs to be acquired and is assumed to be linked to individual items in the lexicon (CAPDEVILA I BATET ET AL. 1995, 31). The central task of acquisition is thus the construction of the grammar of the target language, in other words, the setting of parameters, which is also referred to as grammatical learning (versus lexical learning). One of the parameters that needs to be set is the construction of negation. In this paper, I look at the nature and operation of negation (part I) and how children and adults acquire it during their first and second language acquisition process of different languages (parts II and III). Moreover, underlying principles and mechanisms of L1 and L2 acquisition will be discussed and compared. I want to investigate the way in which the principles and parameters of UG (do not) operate over time as the individual's grammar gradually develops and find out if the children's and adults' grammars conform to these. An individual acquiring L1 has to access the innate grammatical principals of UG in the initial state and learn the language-specific grammatical parameters. L1 acquisition is rapid, uniform and almost error-free. How the acquisition of negation for an L1-learner develops will be presented in the second part. L2-learners have already learned an L1 and are expected to be competent users of the specific grammar of their first language. They learn a second language, i.e. determine a new setting for relevant grammatical parameters in order to arrive at a linguistic system of the target L2. Their acquisition is characterized by great variability crosslinguistically and across individual learners (MEISEL 1997, 227). Part 3 looks at 2LA of negation and wants to describe whether 1LA and 2LA share similarities and if UG plays a role in 2LA.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject American Studies - Linguistics, grade: 2,3, University of Cologne, 14 Literaturquellen entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The ability to learn and produce natural language and move beyond the communication of sign and body language is unique to human beings. The acquisition of language is possible since grammar is assumed to be universal. Universal Grammar (UG) defines properties of language itself. CHOMSKY'S theory of grammar is constrained, first, by universal grammatical principles which determine the broad outline of grammar and are generally true and, second, by grammatical parameters which are language-specific dimensions of a particular language and allow crosslinguistic variation. The first doesn't have to be learned since it is part of the innate language faculty; the latter needs to be acquired and is assumed to be linked to individual items in the lexicon (CAPDEVILA I BATET ET AL. 1995, 31). The central task of acquisition is thus the construction of the grammar of the target language, in other words, the setting of parameters, which is also referred to as grammatical learning (versus lexical learning). One of the parameters that needs to be set is the construction of negation. In this paper, I look at the nature and operation of negation (part I) and how children and adults acquire it during their first and second language acquisition process of different languages (parts II and III). Moreover, underlying principles and mechanisms of L1 and L2 acquisition will be discussed and compared. I want to investigate the way in which the principles and parameters of UG (do not) operate over time as the individual's grammar gradually develops and find out if the children's and adults' grammars conform to these. An individual acquiring L1 has to access the innate grammatical principals of UG in the initial state and learn the language-specific grammatical parameters. L1 acquisition is rapid, uniform and almost error-free. How the acquisition of negation for an L1-learner develops will be presented in the second part. L2-learners have already learned an L1 and are expected to be competent users of the specific grammar of their first language. They learn a second language, i.e. determine a new setting for relevant grammatical parameters in order to arrive at a linguistic system of the target L2. Their acquisition is characterized by great variability crosslinguistically and across individual learners (MEISEL 1997, 227). Part 3 looks at 2LA of negation and wants to describe whether 1LA and 2LA share similarities and if UG plays a role in 2LA.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Das Geschlecht als soziales Konstrukt am Beispiel der Agnes-Studie und am Beispiel Jin Xin by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Phantasien im Sozialisationsprozeß - Das Verhältnis von Eltern und Säugling aus psychoanalytischer und bindungstheoretischer Sicht by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Knowing How and Knowing That - Eine Untersuchung zu Gilbert Ryles 'Concept of Mind' by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Leistungsmotivation und die Rolle des Lehrenden by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book The Soviet Union and the CSCE. How Human Rights helped end the Cold War by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Sexualstraftäter. Verstehen oder stigmatisieren? by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Der Zusammenhang von Schlaf und Gesundheit. Hinweise für einen gesunden Schlaf by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Postsecondary Education and the Ivy League: Vanguard or Foul Play? by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Postmoderne Identitätskonstruktion und Identitätsstörung in Woody Allens 'Zelig', 'Deconstructing Harry' und 'Melinda and Melinda' by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book The Role of the Orthodox Tewahedo Church in Biodiversity Conservation: the case of some churches in Ìnderta, Tigray by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Fehlerkorrektur im Tischtennis by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Adolf Hitler im Spiegel psychologischer Betrachtungsweisen by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Zypern: Ein Konflikt zwischen Stagnation und europäischer Lösungsperspektive by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Eine Analyse des Textes 'Cyberstalking' von Jens Hoffmann by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book An Evaluation of Plato's Ideal State by Lars Berghaus
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy