How useful is teamwork as a method of doing work?

Business & Finance, Management & Leadership, Management
Cover of the book How useful is teamwork as a method of doing work? by Jonas Augustin, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Jonas Augustin ISBN: 9783640945399
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: June 28, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Jonas Augustin
ISBN: 9783640945399
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: June 28, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: 2,0, Lancaster University, language: English, abstract: decisions can be biased by the ambition of forming a consistent team, which blocks the team members' ability to think rationally. Further disadvantages mentioned by Boddy (2005) are the idea that teams could become too independent from their organisation by developing their own dynamics and the fact that teamwork takes too much time since decisions are mainly made by time consuming discussions However, the actual use of teamwork as a method of doing work is not merely a question about the advantages and disadvantages of teamwork. In fact, it should be examined in two different dimensions - the effectiveness and the efficiency of teamwork. The initial question should therefore be divided into two parts: is teamwork effective in a way that the team achieves the goals that were set? And how many resources have to be spent to achieve these goals? The first question has already been answered. Teams are highly effective. All team members bring in different values, skills and experiences. The results of teams are therefore based on a much broader background compared to those of working groups, which essentially means that team results are more effective. There may be situations where working groups deliver results of almost the same quality but those are rare. Boddy (2005) mentions, in this context, small technical problems, that could be resolved by independently working people. Katzenbach and Smith (1993a) believe that teams outperform working groups especially when the task requires both multiple skills and experience. The second question is not as easy to answer. The literature on teamwork has deeply analysed the notion of effectiveness of teams. But the question about their efficiency has found little attention. In order to assess the efficiency of teamwork I want to have a more detailed look on the problems arising from it. At this point, I need to point out that all the assertions about the advantages of teamwork and its effectiveness are based on the assumptions that the team members work perfectly or at least well together, i.e. that they are implemented correctly. Non-functioning teams can cause serious damage to both the team members and the organisation they belong to. Therefore, it is absolutely vital that the problems that can arise from teamwork are solved promptly. A problem that no one takes care of can delete all benefits of teamwork.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: 2,0, Lancaster University, language: English, abstract: decisions can be biased by the ambition of forming a consistent team, which blocks the team members' ability to think rationally. Further disadvantages mentioned by Boddy (2005) are the idea that teams could become too independent from their organisation by developing their own dynamics and the fact that teamwork takes too much time since decisions are mainly made by time consuming discussions However, the actual use of teamwork as a method of doing work is not merely a question about the advantages and disadvantages of teamwork. In fact, it should be examined in two different dimensions - the effectiveness and the efficiency of teamwork. The initial question should therefore be divided into two parts: is teamwork effective in a way that the team achieves the goals that were set? And how many resources have to be spent to achieve these goals? The first question has already been answered. Teams are highly effective. All team members bring in different values, skills and experiences. The results of teams are therefore based on a much broader background compared to those of working groups, which essentially means that team results are more effective. There may be situations where working groups deliver results of almost the same quality but those are rare. Boddy (2005) mentions, in this context, small technical problems, that could be resolved by independently working people. Katzenbach and Smith (1993a) believe that teams outperform working groups especially when the task requires both multiple skills and experience. The second question is not as easy to answer. The literature on teamwork has deeply analysed the notion of effectiveness of teams. But the question about their efficiency has found little attention. In order to assess the efficiency of teamwork I want to have a more detailed look on the problems arising from it. At this point, I need to point out that all the assertions about the advantages of teamwork and its effectiveness are based on the assumptions that the team members work perfectly or at least well together, i.e. that they are implemented correctly. Non-functioning teams can cause serious damage to both the team members and the organisation they belong to. Therefore, it is absolutely vital that the problems that can arise from teamwork are solved promptly. A problem that no one takes care of can delete all benefits of teamwork.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Ist Berichterstattung über Nachhaltigkeit sinnvoll? Eine Nutzen- und Kostenanalyse by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Einfach nur leben. Ein Leben mit Behinderung als ein Leben am Rand der Gesellschaft? by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Berufliche Rehabilitation und die zentrale Rolle der Sozialen Arbeit by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Philosophie der Aufklärung - John Locke (1632-1704) by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Lolita - über Romanadaption und Medienwechsel by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Der russische Ödipus - die erotische Marienverehrung des Grigori Jefimowitsch Rasputin by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Der utopische Staat - Morus: Utopia - Campanella: Sonnenstaat - Bacon: Neu-Atlantis by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Mountainbike-Tourismus: Empirische Untersuchung der Nachfrage und Überlegungen zur Rentabilität von Mountainbiking-Angeboten by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Konfrontative Pädagogik - Konfliktarbeit mit jugendlichen Gewalttätern am Beispiel des Coolness-Training und des Anti-Aggressivitäts-Training by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Zentrale versus dezentrale Anwendung des europäischen Kartellrechts by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Die Festkreise im Christentum by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Cash Flow at Risk-Verfahren für das Risikomanagement by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Unternehmenswertorientiertes Controlling und Intangible Assets by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Nahrungsmittelproduktion in einer globalisierten Welt by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Hooligans: Episodale Schicksalsgemeinschaft by Jonas Augustin
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy