Evaluating Elections
A Handbook of Methods and Standards
Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Elections, Politics, Practical Politics
| Author: | R. Michael Alvarez, Lonna Rae Atkeson, Thad E. Hall | ISBN: | 9781139794336 |
| Publisher: | Cambridge University Press | Publication: | November 12, 2012 |
| Imprint: | Cambridge University Press | Language: | English |
| Author: | R. Michael Alvarez, Lonna Rae Atkeson, Thad E. Hall |
| ISBN: | 9781139794336 |
| Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
| Publication: | November 12, 2012 |
| Imprint: | Cambridge University Press |
| Language: | English |
In competitive and contested democratic elections, insuring integrity is critical. Evaluating Elections shows why systematic analysis and reporting of election performance is important and how data-driven performance management can be used by election officials to improve elections. The authors outline how performance management systems can function in elections and their benefits for voters, candidates and political parties. Journalists, election administrators and even candidates often ask whether recent elections were run well, whether there were problems in the administration of a particular state's elections and how well elections were run across the country. The authors explain that such questions are difficult to answer because of the complexity of election administration and because there is currently no standard or accepted framework to assess the general quality of an election.
In competitive and contested democratic elections, insuring integrity is critical. Evaluating Elections shows why systematic analysis and reporting of election performance is important and how data-driven performance management can be used by election officials to improve elections. The authors outline how performance management systems can function in elections and their benefits for voters, candidates and political parties. Journalists, election administrators and even candidates often ask whether recent elections were run well, whether there were problems in the administration of a particular state's elections and how well elections were run across the country. The authors explain that such questions are difficult to answer because of the complexity of election administration and because there is currently no standard or accepted framework to assess the general quality of an election.
