Censorship in the american press in World War II and the 'Code of Wartime Practices'

Organization, enforcement and consequences

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Language Arts, Communication
Cover of the book Censorship in the american press in World War II and the 'Code of Wartime Practices' by Ludwig Andert, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Ludwig Andert ISBN: 9783638034203
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: April 9, 2008
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Ludwig Andert
ISBN: 9783638034203
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: April 9, 2008
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Communications - Media and Politics, Politic Communications, grade: 1,3, University of Siegen, course: Censorship - Concept & Case Studies, 12 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: On June 25th, 1943, American press editors received a confidential note, the contents an purpose of which was hard to understand even for those who were familiar with the technical terms. It said: '[...] you are asked not to publish or broadcast any information whatever regarding war experiments involving: Production or utilization of atom smashing, atomic energy, atomic fission, atomic splitting, or any of their equivalents. The use for military purposes of radium or radioactive materials, heavy water, high voltage discharge equipment, cyclotrons. The following elements or any of their compounds: polonium, uranium, ytterbium, hafnium, protactinium, radium, rhenium, thorium, deuterium.' What sounded 'like Greek' to the selected adressees of the request, in retrospective can be identified even by an amateur as the attempt to hide evidence that the US government was doing research on a nuclear device. It was about to play a decisive role in the ending of the Pacific War. Since the United States' entry in World War II, domestic censorship had to draw a line very carefully: On the one hand, the First Amendment to the Constitution grands the freedom of speech and the press; on the other hand, sensitive information, if revealed to the public, could fall into the hands of enemy agents. To handle this task, the government set in effect a voluntary censorship, building up on every journalist's patriotic instinct not to publish anything that might be a threat to the war effort. How was censorship organized? What kind of information was censored? Is there an actual difference between voluntary and mandatory censorship? These are questions the following research paper will elaborate on. A brief overview of the practices of censorship in times of war will accompany the analysis. Finally, the text makes an attempt to answer the question how the United States 'survived' the censorship period and how it affected further censorship strategies. An important source for this paper is the book 'Secrets of Victory. The Office of Censorship and the American Press and Radio in World War II' by Michael S. Sweeney, that has been published in 2001. Censorship of the press during war is common to many countries and has been used for strategic ends in many periods of time. A characteristic for modern wars in particular is a 'difference of interest', with journalists torn between their task to report 'as truthfully as possible' and a responsibility not to help the enemy.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Communications - Media and Politics, Politic Communications, grade: 1,3, University of Siegen, course: Censorship - Concept & Case Studies, 12 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: On June 25th, 1943, American press editors received a confidential note, the contents an purpose of which was hard to understand even for those who were familiar with the technical terms. It said: '[...] you are asked not to publish or broadcast any information whatever regarding war experiments involving: Production or utilization of atom smashing, atomic energy, atomic fission, atomic splitting, or any of their equivalents. The use for military purposes of radium or radioactive materials, heavy water, high voltage discharge equipment, cyclotrons. The following elements or any of their compounds: polonium, uranium, ytterbium, hafnium, protactinium, radium, rhenium, thorium, deuterium.' What sounded 'like Greek' to the selected adressees of the request, in retrospective can be identified even by an amateur as the attempt to hide evidence that the US government was doing research on a nuclear device. It was about to play a decisive role in the ending of the Pacific War. Since the United States' entry in World War II, domestic censorship had to draw a line very carefully: On the one hand, the First Amendment to the Constitution grands the freedom of speech and the press; on the other hand, sensitive information, if revealed to the public, could fall into the hands of enemy agents. To handle this task, the government set in effect a voluntary censorship, building up on every journalist's patriotic instinct not to publish anything that might be a threat to the war effort. How was censorship organized? What kind of information was censored? Is there an actual difference between voluntary and mandatory censorship? These are questions the following research paper will elaborate on. A brief overview of the practices of censorship in times of war will accompany the analysis. Finally, the text makes an attempt to answer the question how the United States 'survived' the censorship period and how it affected further censorship strategies. An important source for this paper is the book 'Secrets of Victory. The Office of Censorship and the American Press and Radio in World War II' by Michael S. Sweeney, that has been published in 2001. Censorship of the press during war is common to many countries and has been used for strategic ends in many periods of time. A characteristic for modern wars in particular is a 'difference of interest', with journalists torn between their task to report 'as truthfully as possible' and a responsibility not to help the enemy.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Asymmetric Warfare. A Challenge for International Humanitarian Law? by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Operation Desert Storm - a critical review by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book 'Will they pay for it?' A conceptual framework for analyzing consumer responses to pricing decisions regarding the online distribution of digital content by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Semiotics: A critical analysis of three advertisements by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Die Balanced Scorecard in Dienstleistungsunternehmen by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Deliberating Justice: Indigenous Peoples, the World Bank and the Principle of Free Prior Informed Consent by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Elements of courtly love in Geoffrey Chaucer's 'Miller's Tale' by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Why do Belgian consumers buy fair trade products... and why not? by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book The Protection of Minority Shareholders under the new Company Law of the People's Republic of China by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Foreign Market Servicing Strategies - the METROGroup in China by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Work-life balance and health care benefits - Essential forms of modern life-cycle benefits by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Do international trade relations between the third world and the first world represent neo-colonial tendencies by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Marvell's 'Horatian Ode' as a Political Poem by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book Process Virtualization Theory in the Public Sector: A Scale Development Study by Ludwig Andert
Cover of the book William Blake's idiosyncratic beliefs and his poetry by Ludwig Andert
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy